Calendar A-Z Index School of Arts and Sciences University of Pennsylvania

Research Themes

red arrow Health and Well-Being of Populations

red arrow Human Resources & Endowments

red arrow Innovations in Methods

red arrow International Population
Research

red arrow Policy Evaluation

red arrow Growth and Structure of Populations

red arrow Networks in Population

Related Links:
PSC Working Paper Series Research at PENN

About Us
People
Research
Research Themes
Research Projects
Ph.D. Programs
Publications
Administrative Services
Library & Information Services
Resources
Colloquium
News, Events & Announcements
Our Partners
PSC Directory

Research > Research Themes > Growth and Structure of Populations > Marriage, divorce, cohabitation

Marriage was once a proximate determinant of fertility; but the link with intercourse is long past. Harknett, with J. Goldstein, in Soc Forces find that relationship status at the time of a birth depends mainly on father's race rather than on whether mother and father's race/ethnicity differ. Parents are less likely to marry after a birth if one parent is black, and the relationships of Hispanic couples are particularly stable. Jacobs does research on the relationship between women’s participation in the labor force, education, marriage, and fertility; papers in progress consider spousal financial contributions to marriages under occupational homogamy, and the fertility of students. Kao studies ethnic boundaries to dating and mating; and Park is beginning work on the growth of divorce in Korea and Japan. Ríos-Rull has several papers on marriage and divorce, including interracial marriage patterns and the role of sex-imbalances in marriage (an interest shared with Harknett). A model of marriage with interacting agents is calibrated that assumes an asymmetry across men and women with respect to the length of their fertile period (women can only bear children for a limited period) and that outside opportunities to marry, measured by the ratio of single men to women, play a central role in inducing agents to marry and divorce. The model is consistent with the secular improvement in marriage conditions for men, the rise in age at marriage, and the rise in divorce observed in the data. Stevenson’s work on the effects of unilateral divorce on family violence is described in A1.5; another result is a decline in marriage-specific capital investment (J Lab Econ), and a paper in J Econ Persp surveys forces behind trends in US marriage and divorce rates.

239 McNeil Building, 3718 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6298, Tel: 215-898-6441, Fax: 215-898-2124
Last updated March 11, 2008. Please direct comments or questions about this site to infoczar@pop.upenn.edu